Skeptic Conning Alternative Healers

Skeptic Conning Alternative Healers

A so-called “debunking” video on natural healing.

I like to watch skeptics who talk against alternative healing practitioners. If you know what to look for you can see that THEY are the ones CONNING the people. The above video is an example, so, I will talk on this.

I am familiar with muscle testing and have done this on clients and friends. When I saw this video, I thought it was interesting in what he said. He talks about when your press down on a person's arm and your hand is at his wrist, the client goes weak. But when you press down closer to his body, you are closer to his center of gravity and he will be stronger. This is true, and I thought, “How interesting; I wonder if other energy healers do this.” To check this out, I went to some videos put out by Dr. Bradly Nelson to see if he did this. I had seen his videos before, but this time I watched closely.

Well, Bradly did NOT move his hand closer to the woman's body when he was testing her; during the whole time, his hand was at her wrist; yet, one one question it tested strong and another one, she tested weak. And, it did not look like he used more strength.

Dr. Nelson is the founder of The Emotion Code and I had seen other videos he put out. I recalled that he asked questions that he did not know the answer to, but the answers came back either weak or strong – according to what he asked. (The answer must have been true, or he would not have had the success he has with many, many clients.) He than asked this other lady if she still had back pain (which was her problem), and it was gone.

What this “skeptic” did – who really could be a con man HIMSELF – is he did have some truth in his video. When I saw this, I thought that maybe he was right, but I had to do my own checking. Naturally, if you want to con others you do show them some verifiable truth but at the critical point, you lie. In the case of these so-called “skeptics” who attack alternative health practitioners, it is to get the viewer to not even look into alternative therapies; if the person is new to alternative therapies and comes across a video of this kind, he/she can easily be persuaded back into the allopathic field of: medicate, cut and burn solution for sickness.

You will not see a one-on-one interview where two people from opposite camps discuss alternative healing, energy healing, etc. If you did, “the medicate, cut and burn advocates” can easily be shown wrong.

For example, in the above video, if this guy is really investigating this, which he says he is. He does have a section of this video where he interviews a doctor, when why doesn't he REALLY investigate it? He can do it with a simple FREE call on Skype to anyone who is a founder of a natural healing modality or one of its practitioners. These people would be glad to give an interview and tell their side of the story. But does he? NO! This is a simple cop-out.

This guy, and many other skeptics like him, do not comment nor interview people who have been healed. If he did this simple thing, he would have to become a supporter of energy healing, natural hygiene, etc.; he would have to change the format of his YouTube channel, LOL! But you see, these people don't want to lose the friends they already have; some don't want to lose their jobs (if they work in hospital, for example). So, it's easier for them to continue lying. Well, the only people they fool are the fools that follow people like him!

It's good for everyone to see what the skeptics say. It doesn't have to be in the field of health, it could be on any topic that the mainstream media and academia is against; do your own research; this is more than the so-called honest skeptic does.

One thing to look for is, what these skeptics DON'T talk about; about things that are obvious that they don't discuss. Case in point: What about the clients that have been healed? What about those that showed marked improvement in a short period of time? You don't need “scientific tests” or “scientists” to confirm this; you don't need the “stamp of approval” from the FDA! The results of what the clients say is enough; the negative test results for their disease (after their therapy) that they get from their “board certified medical doctor” should be enough.

Then, there is the physical proof, if that is what skeptics want. There are x-rays, the blood tests, the before and after lab results of various kinds; this is physical proof. But this is ignored in so-called “expose” videos of natural healing therapies. We know that they are ignored because it would prove that the allopathic medicine is a fraud.